April 7, 2008

 
Audio In Close Up - Which Lavalier Should I Use?

A Comparison of Sixteen Popular Wired Lavalier Microphones

By Dan Brockett

     

 
Microphones

Audio-Technica AT899
Countryman B6
DPA 4061
DPA 4071
DPA 4080
PSC Millimic
Sanken COS-11x
Sanken COS-22
Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold
Sonotrim
Sony ECM-44B
Sony ECM-55B
Sony ECM-88B
Tram TR50B
Voice Technologies VT-400
Voice Technologies VT-500

Microphone Voice Tests

Test #1. Male Voice, Interior, Mic Above Wardrobe, Interview Setup
Test #2. Female Voice, Interior, interview setup, above wardrobe
Test #3. Female Voice, Interior, interview setup, below wardrobe
Test #4. Cable Handling Noise Test
Test #5. Cutting Between Shotgun/Cardioid and Lavalier

 
What Is A Lavaliere?
lav·a·liere [lav-uh-leer, lah-vuh-] - noun

  1. An ornamental pendant, usually jeweled, worn on a chain around the neck.
  2. Lavaliere Microphone
Also, lav·a·lier, la·val·lière [Origin: 1915-20; after the Duchesse de La Vallière (1644-1710), one of the mistresses of Louis XIV] - Random House Unabridged Dictionary

"A lavalier microphone or lavalier (or lav or lapel mike) is a small electret or dynamic microphone used for television, theatre, and public speaking applications, in order to allow hands-free operation. They are most commonly provided with small clips for attaching to collars, ties, or other clothing. The cord may be hidden by clothes and either run to a radio frequency transmitter in a pocket or clipped to a belt (for mobile work), or directly to the mixer (for stationary applications)." - Wikipedia

"The first practical lavalier microphone was invented by Lou Burroughs, co-founder of Electro-Voice, Inc." - Electro Voice

Often referred to as a "lav", lavalier microphones are a category of sound gear that is often overlooked and taken for granted by those new to recording sound for picture. When you consider how many models of lavaliers are available, it becomes a considerable challenge to make an intelligent choice about which lavalier you should use in a given situation. If you speak with professional sound mixers, they often have a favorite manufacturer and model of lavalier that they like to use, but why? Based upon my experience, lavalier preference almost seems like a birthright, passed down from generation to generation, but if you are not a professional sound mixer, how do you know which model best suits your needs?

My aim in this article is to provide you with a definitive guide to the most popular lavalier microphones available. You may notice that for several manufacturers, we are testing two or three different models of lavalier. Manufacturers often have several lavaliers in their product lines because their customers have such different needs. A lavalier is used in a news studio in very different way than a sound mixer working on a narrative film would use the same lavalier. Some manufacturers provide multiple screens or caps for their models to alter the mic's frequency response for different needs; some manufacturers instead offer different models of microphone, each with different frequency response curve. Many models of lavalier have a particular purpose that they are expressly designed for. Some of the features that differentiate lavaliers include physical size, whether or not the mic is designed for use under wardrobe, whether the mic is available in different colors to match wardrobe/skin tone, the microphone's water/sweat resistance and what type of mounting schemes and accessories are available for the mic.

Pickup Patterns
If you are not familiar with pickup patterns, I suggest you read this article Location Sound: The Basics and Beyond. A few lavaliers are designed with a cardioid or even a uni-directional pickup pattern, but in this article, we will put the primary focus on omni-directional lavaliers. Uni-directional and cardioid lavs are primarily intended for use above wardrobe and in noisy situations. The main challenge in using these types of mics is trying to maintain consistency in the sound when your talent turns away from the uni-directional or cardioid lav element, the sound levels are reduced, giving an uneven recording quality to the subject. For this reason, for most sound for picture usage, omni-directional lavaliers are more popular.

Quality, Price Range and Size
Another facet that we will touch on in this article is exploration of how cost relates to sound quality. As I discovered in the recent article I wrote on shotguns and cardioid variant microphones, As I Hear It - Choosing the Right Microphone, lower cost microphones can often still provide excellent sound quality. Conversely, I also discovered that in many cases, more expensive microphones provide subtle, often desirable nuances in how they record sound that lower priced units often are lacking. It will be interesting to see if the same phenomenon occurs with lavaliers.

One observation I noticed in assembling and evaluating the candidates for this article is that in most cases, the smallest lavaliers cost considerably more than the physically larger models, a definite case of less is more. In certain cases, for instance, when using microphones in hair or on hats or trying to hide microphones on costumes/wardrobe, a very small microphone just makes life easier. But often, you may not need the smallest microphone available. If you are hiding a lav underneath wardrobe, the size of the microphone becomes irrelevant. You will also discover as you read the article that much like shotguns and cardioid variant microphones, you will eventually want to own at least two or three different lavaliers, even if you never use more than one at a time. The reasons for this will become apparent as you make your way through the article.

Choice Is A Good Thing!
In deciding how to mic a particular scene or shoot, one factor you should think about is the factor of adding choice. Whenever possible, the ideal way to cover most scenes is with two microphones. If you have a boom mic, it is always a good idea to cover your bases with adding a lavalier microphone to the unused audio channel. If you do this consistently, you are giving your editor a great gift known as "choice". If you have a location that sounds good, you may be perfectly satisfied with the sound of your boom microphone. However, what if you have an inexperienced boom operator whose aim is not precise yet with your new expensive tightly patterned shotgun microphone? What if there is a lot of ambient noise that the boom microphone is picking up and for some inexplicable reason, your boom operator doesn't hear it or hears it and neglects to tell you that there was a noise issue? If you were smart and covered the scene also with a lavalier microphone on the other available audio channel, the lavalier may just save your rear in the edit bay. There are also situations where using the close mic sound quality of a lavalier may just plain work better for a scene. If you are shooting scenes with liberal amounts of ambient sound and you have two characters whispering to each other or a character speaking very quietly into their cell phone, you might end with superior results with lavalier microphones.

Wireless? As a rule of thumb, most shots where you cannot locate a boom microphone closer than a couple of feet to the talent, because of movement, framing or multiple cameras, should be covered with lavalier microphones. Personally, I always recommend using a hard-wired lavalier whenever possible. Use wireless systems only as a last resort and when you have to. If the talent is doing a sit-down conversation or interview, there is rarely a reason to use a wireless microphone system. The lowest cost XLR cable will always have better sound quality than the most expensive wireless microphone system. In keeping with this intention, we will only be recording with the lavaliers in the article hard-wired directly to the mixer. Since we are trying to record and evaluate the basic audio characteristics of each candidate, I feel that eliminating wireless noise and interference from the equation will allow us to make a more accurate assessment of each microphone.

A Modular Approach
One factor that is somewhat unique to lavalier microphones is that it is helpful to think of each lavalier as a modular system. When you think of a shotgun microphone, it too is part of a modular system including a microphone mount, a boom pole or handheld mount, an XLR cable, etc. Lavalier microphones today are similar in that there are often several ways to purchase them. It can become confusing to understand all of the different ways that you can purchase lavaliers but here are some basics. Lavalier microphones are condenser microphones, meaning that they require a small electrical current to function. Lavaliers come from the manufacturer hard wired, meaning that the actual microphone capsule is permanently cabled to a small tubular power supply that usually terminates in a three-pin XLR connection. Sometimes a small mercury or lithium battery can power the power supply but in most cases, lavaliers are energized by phantom power that your mixer or camcorder supplies over its XLR inputs. Some lavalier microphones use the same type of power supply but instead of the lavalier portion of the microphone being hard-wired into the power supply, it is detachable from the power supply. There are several types of connections between the small cables from the mic element to the power supply but they all work well. The reason for this is that it allows the microphone to also be attached and powered by various wireless microphone transmitters so if you purchase this type of lavalier, you can often use it in both wired and wireless situations. Microphones that are wired in this method typically cost more than a dedicated hard-wired version.

The other category that lavaliers are modular in is accessories. Some lavaliers come with a nice assortment of accessories with the microphone and all of its accessories included for one price in a small carrying case. Other lavalier microphone systems are sold on a more "ala carte" basis, offering several types of accessories for different situations and the option to purchase whatever you need. Wherever possible, I have tried to include details and costs about optional as well as included accessories.

A Lavaliere Of Many Colors
You will also notice that many of the microphones are available in various colors. The color spectrum usually includes black (the most common color for all microphones and audio gear), white, mocha, tan and brown to match various skin tones. Usually the goal of using a lavalier is to be as unobtrusive as possible so whether or not the microphone is offered in various colors can be a factor in deciding on if a particular microphone is the right one for your needs. Wherever possible, I have tried to highlight all of the colors that a particular microphone is available in. This can be another factor in your choice of purchasing several lavaliers. If you are recording sound in a dark vampire movie, obviously black would be a good candidate. Working on that "Lawrence of Arabia" remake out in the desert, perhaps white would work well against all of those white Bedouin costumes? Shooting interviews with guys wearing swimsuits and no shirts during Spring Break? Perhaps a tiny, flesh tone lavaliere would be helpful? You get the idea, offering their products in different colors allows the manufacturers an edge over some of their competition that only offer their products in black. As a user, these extra colors can really help you successfully minimize the hassle of trying to effectively camouflage your lavalier.

Introducing...The Contestants
I make no claim that the sixteen lavalier microphones tested here should be the only microphones that you consider, although I think that these models cover the majority of the models available on the U.S. market. Since I am based in the States, it made sense to include the most popular brands available easily in the U.S. and known in the U.S. Since I wanted the test to be as fair and unbiased as possible, I decided not to rent or borrow samples, I felt that would not be fair to the manufacturers. We would have no way of knowing if a rental or borrowed sample had been abused, how old it was, etc. So other than my own Countryman B6, I decided only to test factory fresh samples obtained directly from the manufacturers. Countryman would not cooperate by providing review samples so the Countryman B3 and EMW do not appear in the article although the B6 does.

Something to consider is that by reading this article and listening to the samples, you can train your ear and increase your knowledge of what you like and don't like in microphones. You can use this knowledge in the future when you consider buying any type of microphone. Good sound is easy to identify and high quality recording will become easier for you to recognize after you read through this article and analyze the sound samples.

The microphones are listed in alphabetical order.

 
#1. Audio-Techinca AT899

  

Manufacturer Description of Element: Fixed-charge back plate
permanently polarized condenser
Polar Pattern: Omni-directional
$299.00 MSRP
Audio-Technica U.S., Inc.
1221 Commerce Drive
Stow, Ohio 44224
www.audio-technica.com
Relative size: On the smaller side
Weight: (less cable and accessories) Microphone 0.5 g (0.02 oz)
Power Module 102 g (3.6 oz)
Dimensions: Microphone 16.0 mm (0.63") long, 5.0 mm (0.20") diameter
Power Module 145.0 mm (5.71") long, 21.0 mm (0.83") diameter
Extras: AT8537 power module;AT8439 cable clip;clothing clip base; viper clip base;magnet clip base and plate with lanyard; three single mic holders; two double mic holders; two element covers; two windscreens; battery; protective carrying case
Cosmetics: Nice low reflectance matte black finish, also available in beige, features a medium sized, fairly thick cable
Fit and Finish: High quality feel for relatively low cost lavalier

Audio-Technica's description of the microphone:
Maximum intelligibility and clean, accurate reproduction for vocalists, lecturers, stage and television talent, and worship leaders

  • Low-profile design (a mere 5 mm in diameter) is ideal for applications requiring minimum visibility
  • ncludes an extensive array of accessories
  • Switchable low-frequency roll-off reduces sensitivity to popping in close vocal use
  • Operates on battery or phantom power
  • Available in black or beige
The AT899 is designed to be worn as a lavalier or hidden in loose clothing or in the hair. For use as a lavalier, attach the microphone about six inches below the chin. Anticipate movements that may cause the microphone to rub against or be covered by clothing, and position the microphone to avoid it.

The included single and double mic holders are interchangeable with all the bases. To change the holders, simply remove original holder and snap in the desired one. When using the AT899 in extremely close situations, slip the included open-pore foam windscreen over the mic to reduce wind noise or "popping". Use the included element cover to protect the microphone element from contaminants.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
In general, I have always found Audio-Technica products to provide solid value and to be well constructed. I personally own several Audio-Technica microphones as well as an Audio-Technica wireless microphone system. The AT-899 had a surprisingly good sound quality to it and I also liked it's no fuss appearance. The choice of black or beige was a plus also. The AT-899 also provides a good variety of mounting accessories which further increase versatility. The AT-899 is also a low cost leader so when value is added up, the AT-899 places very high for bang for the buck.

[Top]

 
#2. Countryman B6

  

Manufacturer Description of polar pattern: Omnidirectional lavalier
$434.60 MSRP
195 Constitution Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
www.countryman.com
Relative size: smallest lavalier on the market
Weight: 0.6g (.002 oz.)
Dimensions: 0.1" (2.5 mm) X 0.15" (3.8 mm)
Extras: protective carrying case, tie clip, belt clip, windscreen and set of 3 protective caps Cosmetics: So tiny it must be seen to be believed
Fit and Finish: Very nice look, microscopic size. Cable is microscopic as well.

Countryman's description of the microphone:
Only one tenth of an inch (2.5mm) in diameter, the B6 outperforms microphones of many times its size. The B6 features replaceable protective caps that can change its color and frequency response to match your application. Designed to survive, it's highly resistant to moisture, makeup and other hazards found in a production environment.

Features:
Easily Hidden. Smaller than the cable of other lavaliers, the B6 is effectively hidden when it's in plain sight. For example, chose a protective cap near the color of a shirt and poke the B6 out through the buttonhole. Tape the cable to the back of the shirt to secure it and you are done. Say goodbye to the hassle and degraded sound quality you get by burying mics under clothing!

Makeup and Sweat Resistant
Built to withstand perspiration and makeup, the B6 will even survive an overnight soak in your favorite cola beverage! The outer screen in the B6's replaceable caps stops makeup and sweat before it enters the mic element. If it clogs, you can simply remove the cap for cleaning or replacement.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
I have quite a bit of experience in shooting with this microphone, as I have owned one for a number of years. It is extremely easy to use and to rig because of its diminutive size. It sounds great and works well. It will be interesting to do some side-by-side comparison between the B6 and it's physically larger competitors.

[Top]

 
#3. DPA 4061

  

Manufacturer Description of microphone: Pre-polarised condenser element with vertical diaphragm
$443.00 MSRP
DAK 4060 (ENG Type Accessory kit) $109.00
DAK 4071-F (Film/Hidden Mic Accessory kit) $125.00
DAD 6001-BC (XLR Adaptor) $107.00
DPA Microphones, Inc.
2432 Main Street, Suite 200
Longmont, CO 80501
www.dpamicrophones.com
Relative size: On the small side
Weight: 7.5g (0.26 oz.) inc. cable and microdot connector
Dimensions: 12.7mm (0.5 in) long
Extras: protective carrying case, 1 high boost and 1 soft boost miniature grid
Cosmetics: Brown version tested, also available in black, beige and white
Fit and Finish: Nice, very high quality

DPA's description of the microphone:
The DPA 4061-CM is the brown version of the Miniature Microphone DPA 4061. This type is a pre-polarized omni directional Miniature Condenser Microphone with a 5.4 mm vertical diaphragm specially designed for maximum performance under the often difficult conditions when mounted directly on the human body.

Special attention has been taken in the design to deal with the humidity problems that often occur in theatrical applications. A double vent protection system together with water resistant materials inside the microphone make it more than difficult for moisture to cause the Miniature Microphone to fail.

By changing the protection grids, the Miniature Microphones can furthermore be acoustically modified according to the placement of the microphone on the body. DPA 4061 is acoustically identical with the award winning DPA 4060, but the sensitivity is adjusted to 6 mV/Pa to match some of the more sensitive transmitters on the market. The noise floor of the DPA 4061 is 26 dB(A) re. 20 µPa and if powered correctly the microphone will be able to handle sound pressure levels up to 144 dB SPL before clipping occurs.

A wide range of connection adapters makes it possible to use the 4061 with close to any professional wireless system available plus 48 V phantom.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
I learned during my preliminary research for this article that DPA is a continuation of the old Brüel & Kjær brand of audio gear. I have not ever used a DPA microphone before and most of the sound mixers that I spoke with over the course of this article were not really very familiar with DPA. That said, I was impressed with the appearance and functionality of the 4061 and the DPA Micro-Dot connector. The sound was very transparent and I was quite blown away by how natural and smooth the 4061 sounded. It will be interesting to hear it in A/B tests with the other models for this article.

[Top]

 
#4. DPA 4071

  

Manufacturer Description of microphone: Pre-polarised condenser element with vertical diaphragm
$485.00 MSRP
DAK 4060 (ENG Type Accessory kit) $109.00
DAK 4071-F (Film/Hidden Mic Accessory kit) $125.00
DAD 6001-BC (XLR Adaptor) $107.00
DPA Microphones, Inc.
2432 Main Street, Suite 200
Longmont, CO 80501
www.dpamicrophones.com
Relative size: On the small side
Weight: 9g (0.31 oz.) inc. cable and microdot connector
Dimensions: 17mm (0.66 in) long
Extras: protective carrying case
Cosmetics: Beige version tested, also available in black, brown and white
Fit and Finish: Classy looking, very high quality

DPA's description of the microphone:
The 4071 features a specially designed, fixed microphone grid with a soft presence boost of typically 5 dB at 4 - 6 kHz. Speech intelligibility, clarity and definition of voices and instruments lie within the area that the 4071 grid boosts. While clarity seems to be missing from chest-worn microphone placement, the 4071 will make voices cut through. Typical applications are ENG/EFP use on the reporter in studio or in the field, or film production use, with hidden microphone placements on the actors.

When recording voices from mic placement on a performers body, no frequency below 100 Hz is attractive. For this reason, an acoustical low-cut has been incorporated in the 4071 capsule so the built-in pre amp, and the perhaps following wireless system, will have much larger headroom. Apart from the low-cut feature, type 4071 uses the same prepolarised omnidirectional miniature condenser capsule as its world-famous "brother" 4061. A wide range of connection adapters makes it possible to use the 4071 with most professional wireless system available plus 48 V phantom.

A wide range of accessory equipment is available from DPA Microphones to offer the engineer easy, fast and safe mounting of the 4071. Two accessory kits, the DAK4071-E and DAK4071-F, complete this carefully prepared microphone solution.

Dan's initial take on the microphone: The DPA 4071 is different in appearance from the 4061. The main functional differences between the two are that the 4061 features removable and changeable grid caps where the 4071 does not. To my ear, the DPA 4071 has a more mid-range focused sound than the 4061. DPA has a tremendous amount of accessories available for the 4071 and I very much liked the sound quality that it presents.

[Top]

 
#5. DPA 4080

  

Manufacturer Description of microphone: Miniature Cardioid Microphone with Pre-polarized condenser element with vertical diaphragm
$559.00 MSRP
DAD 6001-BC (XLR Adaptor) $107.00
DPA Microphones, Inc.
2432 Main Street, Suite 200
Longmont, CO 80501
www.dpamicrophones.com
Relative size: Largest microphone tested
Weight: 15g (0.5 oz.) inc. cable and microdot connector
Dimensions: 30mm (1.2 in) long
Extras: protective carrying case
Cosmetics: Looks like a black caterpillar
Fit and Finish: Nice, pre-mounted on wardrobe clip

DPA's description of the microphone:
Combining high audio quality and low visibility, the new DPA 4080 is well suited for broadcast, conference, and other live performances in the studio or in the field.

It is acoustically pre-equalized, offering a 4 dB presence boost, which makes the voice more distinguishable and improves speech intelligibility. Professionals will appreciate the light weight and the excellent speech reproduction.

DPA 4080 is delivered with a pre-mounted pop filter in a holder with an integrated shock mount, fixed on a clip. Because of the flexible and practical mounting solution, the microphone can easily be turned in all directions and fits both left and right buttoned shirts.

All parts of the microphone are manufactured in highly resistant materials and designed to perform under stress.

Dan's initial take on the microphone: The DPA 4080 appears to resemble a small, black Caterpillar. It is unique in that it's windscreen is permanently affixed to the mic and that the 4080 is a cardioid lavalier. The 4080 is too large and too directional to be used as anything other than a "you can see it on the talent" type of lavalier but for certain situations, mainly when you need more isolation from ambient sound, the 4080 looks promising.

[Top]

 
#6. PSC Millimic

  

Manufacturer Description of microphone: Omni Electret Lavalier
$179.00 MSRP
Professional Sound Corporation
28085 Smyth Drive
Valencia, CA 91355
www.professionalsound.com
Relative size: small square microphone element
Weight: 16.2g (0.55 oz.)
Dimensions: .180" x .290" x .313" (4.4mm x 7.4mm x 8mm)
Extras: Case, tie bar, tape down mount, cable mount, vampire clip, windscreen clip and "Guard Mount"
Cosmetics: Black smooth plastic finish
Fit and Finish: Classic. Very good build quality.

PSC's description of the microphone:
Professional Sound Corporation has designed and built the ultimate production lavalier, the MilliMic. Incorporating the latest in capsule design, the MilliMic boasts miniature size, very high output, a low inherent noise floor and exceptional shielding against electromagnetic interference. The soft, flexible and non-reflective finish of the MilliMics cable will also better isolate handling noise and keep the MilliMic unobtrusive on camera.

Included in the MilliMic's attractive storage case are a wide variety of MilliMic mounting accessories including a tie bar, tape down mount, cable mount, vampire clip, windscreen clip and the exclusive Professional Sound Corporation "Guard Mount", useful in applications where concealment is mandatory and clothing noise must be negated.

Professional Sound Corporation has taken yet another revolutionary step in the development of the MilliMic Power Supply. This power supply is available in a variety of connector configurations, and thanks to its Lithium Power Cell, the MilliMic Power Supply will power your MilliMic for up to an amazing five year duration.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
Professional Sound Corporation is a unique company based in Valencia, Ca. In appearance, the PSC MilliMic closely resembles some of the other microphones tested, mainly the Tram and the Sonotrim. The MilliMic comes with a good amount of accessories and a nice case and power supply. The sound is dominated by a mid-range boost that should work well under wardrobe. We shall see.

[Top]

 
#7. Sanken COS-11X

  

Manufacturer Description of polar pattern: Omni-directional pre-polarized condenser
$414.00 MSRP (48v, BP) $ 314.00 (PT)
Plus 24
1155 N. La Brea Avenue
West Hollywood, CA 90038
USA
www.plus24.net
Relative size: medium to small diameter, long length microphone
Weight: .58g
Dimensions: 0.15" X .63" (4.0mm X 16.1 mm)
Extras: WS-11 windscreen,RM-11 rubber mount and HC-11 holder clip
Cosmetics: Available in black, beige, grey, white. Nice baked enamel finish
Fit and Finish: Fit and Finish: New "X" variant has enhanced stress relief. Great feel. Longer cable to power supply than most.

Sanken description of the microphone: Sanken, manufacturer of the industrywide standard in ultra-miniature lavalier microphones, now offers the COS-11x. This new generation lavalier was enhanced to meet today's HD audio standards while satisfying the concealment requirements of film, video and theater. Available in three models: 48volt phantom, BP, and PT, the COS-11x features a new front mesh screen which is water resistant, better protecting the microphone from perspiration and cosmetics. As a result, the COS-11x maintains superb frequency response and polar pattern even in adverse recording conditions. Sanken was the first to utilize an original vertical placement of the diaphragm for a much greater effective area within an extremely small casing. Sanken's unique and innovative designs have been emulated by other microphone manufacturers, but never matched in quality and performance.

To increase the scope of applications, four colors are now available in the COS-11x series: Black, Gray, Beige and White. Soft and pliable cabling and clamp design assures long-term durability when the microphone is attached to costumes and is pulled through clothing or hair. To create the COS-11x, Sanken has combined extensive R&D with the world's most advanced precision craftsmanship for the ultimate in sensitivity and natural sound.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
The Sanken COS-11X is the successor to Sanken's wildly successful COS-11. This microphone is extremely popular with professional sound mixers and is probably one of the most used microphones in television as well as in features. The COS-11X is available in multiple colors besides black and includes a longer than usual cable between the capsule and the power supply. The Sanken does not include as many mounting accessories as some of the other mics tested but it sounds great with a rich, full sound that some of the competition was lacking in.

[Top]

 
#8. Sanken COS-22

  

Manufacturer Description of polar pattern: Omni-directional self-polarized condenser
$649.00 MSRP
Plus 24
1155 N. La Brea Avenue
West Hollywood, CA 90038
USA
www.plus24.net
Relative size: large "T" shaped microphone
Weight: .2g
Dimensions: 1.24" X .15" (31.6mm X 4 mm)
Extras: HC-22 Holder clip
Cosmetics: Gray enamel. Nice satin finish
Fit and Finish: Top quality

Sanken description of the microphone:
COS-22 World's First Two-Channel Lavalier Microphone

The Sanken COS-22 is the world's first dual capsule lavalier mic. In the tradition of the industry-wide popular Sanken COS-11s lavalier - copied but never matched in quality - the ultra-miniature COS-22 measures only 1.25" in length but boasts a truly unique concept: dual high-performance omni-mics in a tiny package. The two-channel, dual omni-directional COS-22 is designed for a variety of applications, including high quality unobtrusive area miking, stereo recording of music and environmental ambience, redundant capsule live broadcast (e.g. news anchors), and boundary-style miking for film and television.

In addition, the COS-22 can be used as a noise cancellation directional microphone pair by reversing the phase of one channel before summing the two outputs. The COS-22 two-channel lavalier microphone is the result of a joint engineering effort by Sanken and NHK to create a new generation of microphones designed to meet today's highest audio standards while satisfying the concealment requirements of high-resolution film and video. Ideal for voice or instruments in live broadcasting, location recording and studio applications, the COS-22 utilizes the world's most advanced precision craftsmanship for the ultimate in sensitivity, natural sound and hidden capabilities.

The proprietary vertical diaphragm introduced by Sanken is an example of its innovative and unique product designs. Often simulated, Sanken products provide the optimum results and the highest quality available today.

  • Ultra-miniaturization plus high performance for concealment applications
  • Complete redundancy from capsule to connections.
  • High output and low noise with extremely smooth omni-directional patterncontrol over a wide frequency range
  • Exclusive PPS (Poly-phenylene-sulfide) diaphragm provides dramatically higher humidity and temperature stability, outperforming all other condenser lavaliers
  • Vertical diaphragm placement protects against moisture.
  • Built-in 3-layer windscreen minimizes pops, sibilance and wind noise
  • Holder clip provides critical distance between microphone and clothing for avoidance of mechanical/surface noise

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
The Sanken COS-22 is another very unique microphone. Much like the DPA 4080, it's size and shape preclude it from being useful under wardrobe without elaborate rigging. If you are shooting in a situation where redundancy is a primary concern or providing a dual mono/stereo lav feed is important. This microphone is a viable alternative to using two separate lavaliers. The sound quality came across very well, it sounds basically like the COS-11X to my ears.

[Top]

 
9. Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold

  

Manufacturer Description of microphone: Omni-directional lavalier
$573.30 MSRP
Sennheiser
1 Enterprise Drive
Old Lyme, CT 06371
www.sennheiserusa.com
Relative size: about right in the middle in size, smaller than most but larger than some
Weight: 1g (0.04 oz.)
Dimensions: 6.02" (4.8 mm) long, 0.19"
Extras: 1 MZC 2-1 cap (short), 1 MZC 2-2 cap (long) (for altering the frequency response curve)
Cosmetics: Black matte
Fit and Finish: Very nice black metallic finish with typical Sennheiser high-quality feel.

Sennheiser description of the microphone:

General Description The MKE 2-4 Gold-C is a high-quality, sub-miniature clip-on lavalier micro- phone which is suitable for both speech and instrument miking applica- tions in all areas of live work. It fulfils the most stringent demands on sound quality and is extremely rugged. A special Umbrella DiaphragmTM and a welded housing protect the MKE 2 Gold against sweat and moisture, making it an ideal choice for theatrical productions. Colour: matte black.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
The Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold presented with an unusual sound to my ear, it had an enhanced high end frequency response. The microphone had very good isolation from ambient sound. You can listen for yourself if you feel that the Sennheiser cuts between and blends in well with shotguns and cardioid microphones. Much like the Audio-Technica AT899, this microphone appears to be easy to use although the list price was much higher.

[Top]

 
10. Sonotrim STR-BPS

  

Manufacturer Description of polar pattern: electret condenser lavalier microphone
$372.00 MSRP
Posthorn Recordings
142 W. 26th Street
New York, NY 10001
www.posthorn.com
Relative size: Physically looks identical to Tram TR-50B, medium rectangular size
Weight: N/A
Dimensions: .18" x .300" x .55" (4.5mm x 7.6mm x 13.97mm)
Extras: Boundary-Layer Tape-Down Holder (*BLTD)Cable Holder with Vampire Pins (*CH), Clip on Holder with Vampire Pins (*COH), Tie Bar with Alligator Clip (*TB), Tie Tac (*TT), Windscreen (*WS), Tape Down (*TD), Carrying Case (*CC), Cable Reel (*CR) - PS versions only Cosmetics: Black matte tested, available in four colors with matching accessories
Fit and Finish: Smooth black metallic finish with beveled edges

Sonotrim's description of the microphone:
The SONOTRIM is a high-quality electret microphone whose low profile and broad range of accessories make it ideal for "body" or "stashed" placement. It readily interfaces with all popular wireless systems, or it may be battery-powered. It is distinguished from "look-alikes" by its more "open" sound, thanks to a special transducer of a broadband, low-distortion, low-noise design. A hint of high-frequency emphasis improves speech intelligibility and helps to offset the inevitable compromises in placement.

Lavalier & Accessories
The SONOTRIM is small enough to be exposed where a larger microphone would need to be hidden, eliminating the risk of clothing rustle and muffled sound. In these important respects the SONOTRIM is indispensable to the working sound mixer or recordist.

Why does it look like a Tram but not sound like one? Only the capsule is different - but vive la diffŽrence! The SONOTRIM's less nasal, more natural sound mixes surprisingly well with a good boom mike to achieve a combination of presence and ambience well suited to today's film and video projects. The flatter high-frequency response of the SONOTRIM reduces the raw, gritty "edge" produced by the HF peak in some microphones, which interacts with the transmitter's pre-emphasis network to create distortion at even moderate levels. Also, the SONOTRIM can be reversed in its mount to reduce wind and clothing noise without altering its sound (the Tram gets "peakier" when turned to face inward). Finally, the SONOTRIM's quality control is tighter, as each unit is individually measured and auditioned to meet rigid standards. Otherwise, their battery supplies (if the same bias!) and accessories are interchangeable.

But it costs more! Better things often do. Besides, the price includes the Boundary Layer Tape-Down clip as an extra, tucked into a blue snap-clasp carrying case along with the usual Tie Tac, Tape-Down tab, Cable Holder, Windscreen and Clip-On Holder ("Vampire clip"). When the microphone must be hidden under clothing (despite the risk of rubbing noise and muffled sound), the optional Microphone Cage accessories can be a real help. The plain back MC-1 uses double-stick tape; the MC-2 is backed by a "Vampire clip."

How is it powered?
The SONOTRIM can be powered by any of the popular wireless transmitters or by its own STR-79 battery supply, which is also useful as a standby in the event of RF problems. Battery life, depending on cell type, is 4000-20,000 hours. The hardwired STR-PS model will work with 12V-48V phantom power, as will the positive-bias battery supplies (but doremove the battery first!). PLEASE NOTE: SONOTRIMs wired for positive bias, if powered by a wireless transmitter, may be "out-of-phase" when mixed with other microphones. To prevent any risk of cancellation, use a "phase-reverse" cable or adapter at the receiver's output. When powered by the STR-79 battery supply, however, the microphone's polarity is inverted to be "in phase" with the others.

What's this about positive and negative bias?
Older RF transmitter designs, which powered electret microphones, were usually wired for negative bias. Newer designs either offer both bias options or are positive-bias only. In wireless applications, given the rather arbitrary notion of "ground," the choice makes little difference. However, when the microphone with its battery supply is connected to conventionally grounded equipment, positive bias is definitely preferred. Negative bias leaves the microphone element ungrounded, vulnerable to the hums and buzzes generated by SCRs in lighting boards and the manifold sources of EMI and RFI that inhabit most recording environments. The SONOTRIM's two-conductor shielded cable allows the capsule to be wired for either positive or negative bias.

Dan's initial take on the microphone: I have always been curious about the Sonotrim. As the owner of two Tram TR-50B lavaliers, I had always heard things about the supposedly different sound characteristics of the Sonotrim. Turns out all of those rumors were correct, the Sonotrim does sound different than the Tram. It has a similar basic quality as the Tram, but overall, I found it's mids to be smoother and it's lows to be a bit better. A nice choice.

[Top]

 
11. Sony ECM-44

  

Manufacturer Description of polar pattern: Electret condenser lavalier
$250.00 MSRP
Sony Electronics Inc.
123 W. Tryon Ave
Teaneck, NJ 07666
http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/index.shtml
Relative size: Fairly large overall and largest diameter of all lavs reviewed
Weight: 2g (0.07 oz.)
Dimensions: 11/32" dia. X 19/32" (8.5mm X 14.5mm)
Extras: Carrying case, microphone holder, wind screen, operating instructions, warranty booklet
Cosmetics: Black matte
Fit and Finish: satin black metallic finish.

Sony's description of the microphone:
Miniature electret condenser lavaliere microphone. Black anodized finish; Omni-directional; AA battery operation only. XLR Connector attached.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
The Sony ECM-44 has long been a film school and institutional lavalier of choice. Mainly because it doesn't cost much and it says Sony on it. After living with the ECM-44 and using it on several jobs, I can say that it sounds very good for its price range. It sounds pretty good overall, although its highs seem a bit muted to me. The ECM-44 surprisingly did not change sound characteristics much when used under wardrobe either. A surprising performance, not bad at all.

[Top]

 
12. Sony ECM-55

  

Manufacturer Description of polar pattern: Electret condenser lavalier
$375.00 MSRP
Sony Electronics Inc.
123 W. Tryon Ave
Teaneck, NJ 07666
http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/index.shtml
Relative size: Fairly large overall and largest diameter of all lavs reviewed
Weight: 6.4g (0.23 oz.)
Dimensions: 7/16" dia. X 27/32" (10.6mm X 21mm)
Extras: Carrying case, double clip microphone holder, horizontal microphone holder, vertical microphone holder, wind screen, operating instructions, warranty booklet Cosmetics: Black matte
Fit and Finish: satin black metallic finish.

Sony's description of the microphone:
With a black anodized finish and a frequency response tailored for enhanced presence and improved voice quality, Sony's ECM55B Omni-Directional Electret Condenser Lavalier Microphone is well suited for a wide range of applications. The microphone features a two-way powering system, meaning it will work through an AA-size battery or an external power supply. And the head of the mic weighs only 6.5 grams (0.23 ounces).

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
The Sony ECM-55 physically has a strong resemblance to the ECM-44 but is, in fact, a totally different microphone. You discover this the second you plug it in. The ECM-55 comes with more mounting accessories than the ECM-44 and I would describe the sound as having more high end and more mid-range frequency response than the ECM-44. If you have your heart set on an inexpensive Sony lav, I highly recommend listening to both and then deciding which sounds and works better for your individual situation.

[Top]

 
13. Sony ECM-88

  

Manufacturer Description of polar pattern: Electret condenser lavalier
$600.00 MSRP
Sony Electronics Inc.
123 W. Tryon Ave
Teaneck, NJ 07666
http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/index.shtml
Relative size: Very small lavalier with side angle diaphragm opening
Weight: 32g (1.12 oz.) inc. cablev Dimensions: 5/32 x 5/32 x 11/16 inch
Extras: Carrying case, S.H. tie clip, S.V. tie clip, D.H. tie clip, U windscreen, operating instructions, warranty booklet, Ferrite clamp
Cosmetics: Black matte
Fit and Finish: satin black metallic finish.

Sony's description of the microphone:
The ECM-88B is a miniature omni-directional electret-condenser microphone ideally suited for quality-critical applications in broadcasting, theater and field production. This lavalier mic achieves high-sensitivity and has a flat-and-wide frequency response. The ECM-88B offers extremely low handling noise with unparalleled high sound quality. The ECM-88B comes with a DC-78 power supply and it has a cable length of 8.2 feet. This model is best suited for wired lav mic applications. However; with the DC-78 power supply disconnected, the ECM-88B's 4-pin (SMC9-4P) connector can also be used with Sony WRT-822B and WRT-8B wireless mic body-pack transmitters. Other ECM-88 Series models include: the ECM-88BC; supplied with a 4-pin connector (SMC9-4P) optimized for wireless mic use (cable length 3.9 feet); the ECM-88BPT pigtail version (without connector), and the ECM-88FPT beige-colored pigtail version (without connector).

Moving around while wearing a lavalier mic can often cause lav mic cables to rub against a users clothing. In many existing lavalier mic designs, this (frequently unavoidable) body movement can cause loud undesirable handling noise. The ECM-88B radically reduces this handling noise making it ideal for use in applications where users are moving.
  • Flat-and-wide frequency response
Many lavalier microphones are specifically optimized for speech reproduction and have limited use in other applications. The ECM-88B extends it's frequency response beyond the range of speech reproduction, and can be used for many high quality sound applications requiring a miniature mic that can easily be concealed.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
The ECM-88 is an interesting microphone. It is quite small, although nowhere near as small as the Countryman B6. If you examine the ECM-88, you will see that it has side entrance diaphragm openings, none on the tip of the capsule. The sound is very clear, clean and smooth. I was quite taken with the performance of the mic and would definitely consider it for most shooting situations. The Sony ECM-88 is not inexpensive but if you want a great lavalier, it may be worth the cost to you.

[Top]

 
14. Tram TR-50

  

Manufacturer Description of polar pattern: electret condenser lavalier microphone
$310.00 MSRP
Theodore A. Rapp Associates, Inc.
728 Craigville Road
Chester, N.Y. 10918
www.tram-usa.com
Relative size: Physically looks identical to Sonotrim STR-BPS, medium rectangular size
Weight: N/A
Dimensions: .18" x .300" x .55" (4.5mm x 7.6mm x 13.97mm)
Extras: Cable Holder with Vampire Pins (*CH), Clip on Holder with Vampire Pins (*COH), Tie Bar with Alligator Clip (*TB), Tie Tac (*TT), Windscreen (*WS), Tape Down (*TD), Carrying Case (*CC), Cable Reel (*CR)
Cosmetics: Distinctive Black matte rectangular shape
Fit and Finish: Smooth black metallic finish with beveled edges

Tram's description of the microphone:

When it was introduced, the TRAM® TR50 miniature microphone revolutionized the industry- it has become the standard in feature film, television production and other areas of the entertainment industry. In addition to its diminutive size and superior sound quality, the TR-50 offers a combination of features that are simply not offered by any other microphone.

The TRAM¨ TR50 miniature professional lavalier microphone answers the needs of even the most demanding sound recording engineer. It has been designed with the latest electret development and electronics technology, to provide high sound quality with little or no visibility. Its small size and unique design permit a variety of uses and fastening options, that make it ideal for unobtrusive appearance and hidden mic use. The tiny omni-directional capsule features minimum sound coloration and is therefore easily combined with boom mics during post production. A variety of accessories makes mounting the mic on or under clothing easy, with reliable results.

The extended frequency response range and omni-directional characteristics have been designed to satisfy the most stringent requirements in all professional audio fields, particularly film and TV production.

The TR50 is available with a variety of connectors (Micro-Mini, Lemo (4, 6 or 8pin), Mini Switchcraft (3, 4 or 5pin), Sony, Sennheiser, etc.) For direct attachment to any wireless microphone transmitter. In addition to its use with wireless transmitters, the TR-50 can be used as a low impedance hard-wired microphone with the TR-79 power supply. 12/48v phantom powering (in addition to internal powering) is available on all TR-50*PS microphones and TR-79+ positive bias power supplies.

The TR79 power supply provides a balanced transformer output to an XLR connector and uses an Eveready 357 battery. The battery compartment is designed to permit only one insertion direction, so the polarity cannot be reversed. This compartment is accessible by turning the black plastic end cap counter clockwise and pulling firmly. The battery is removed by pushing it out with a sharp object through the hole provided in the bottom of' the compartment.

TR50 Lavalier Mic Features:

Dan's initial take on the microphone: The Tram TR-50B is a modern classic. You will find Trams in use in many different venues and types of production. It sounds good, although not as good as the Sonotrim to my ear. But the difference is minimal, just really a slightly more honky mid-range on the Tram. The TR-50 comes with some really nice mounting accessories and a particularly nice case. It is reliable and I can attest that when locating the capsule underneath a shirt collar, the TR-50 still sounds good.

[Top]

 
15. Voice Technologies VT-400

  

Manufacturer Description of microphone: electret condenser lavalier microphone
$340.00 MSRP for XLR barrel "hardwire" version
Redding Audio, Inc.
97 South Main Street,
Unit #10 Newtown, CT 06470
www.reddingaudio.com
Relative size: Smaller sized cylindrical lavalier
Weight: 28 grams (0.98 oz.)
Dimensions: . 1.5mm Length 1.3m
Extras: It comes in the waterproof VTO box with 6 accessories: Clip, Windscreen with Acoustic Tube, separate Acoustic Tube, Tie Tac Clip, Dracula Mount, Rubber Body Mount
Cosmetics: Black matte, snap on acoustic tubes
Fit and Finish: Smooth black metallic finish with beveled edges

Voice Technologies' description of the microphone:
The VT400 is a very small Electret Condenser Microphone and extremely lightweight. Fitted with a miniature microphone cap- sule, it looks attractive, totally unobtrusive and is in most cases almost unnoticeable. It is excellent for stage presentations, theatre and broadcast studio operations.

Dan's initial take on the microphone: The Voice Technologies line was not familiar to me before writing this article but I must say that I was pleasantly surprised. The VT-400 has en even and smooth sound that would work well with most kinds of voices. The VT-400 is very reasonably priced for a sophisticated European microphone. It also receives my award for best case of any lavalier, it's water proof, small and even has it's own lanyard. A very pleasant discovery.

[Top]

 
16. Voice Technologies VT-500

  

Manufacturer Description of microphone: electret condenser lavalier microphone
$295.00 MSRP for XLR barrel "hardwire" version
Redding Audio, Inc.
97 South Main Street,
Unit #10 Newtown, CT 06470
www.reddingaudio.com
Relative size: Smaller sized - similar in shape to Tram/Sonotrim/PSC
Weight: 7 grams (0.98 oz.)
Dimensions: 9mm height, 7mm wide
Extras: It comes in the waterproof VTO box with 5 accessories: Alligator clip, Professional
Windscreen, Tie Tac Clip, Dracula Mount & Rubber Body Mount
Cosmetics: Black matte, Beige, White
Fit and Finish: Rectangular shape with inset circular grid

Voice Technologies' description of the microphone:
The VT500 has extremely smooth omni-directional pattern control over a wide frequency range. It is designed for performing talent in broadcast, theatre, film, public address and sound reinforcement among other applications.

Speech clarity is enhanced by a slight frequency emphasis giving excellent voice reproduction while eliminating placement constraints. Due to the unique design of the VT500, noise transmission from handling and clothing movement is kept at a minimum. An integral filter provides efficient RF suppression. The cable is smooth, rugged, sweat proof and has excellent isolation from rubbing noise.

Dan's initial take on the microphone:
The VT-500 is another rectangular variant, much in the vein of the Sonotrim, Tram and PSC MilliMic. Based upon my tests, the VT-500 is a bit easier to rig under wardrobe, mainly because of the circular, recessed diaphragm that is located in the middle of the capsule. The VT-500 seemed to emphasize the highs a bit more than the VT-400, which would lend it to being a bit better also for use under wardrobe. The cost on the VT-500 is very reasonable and for the money, this mic sounds great and is an excellent value.

[Top]

 
Comparison Table

[Top]

 
The Tests
Testing lavaliers is a different process than testing regular microphones. Lavaliers present a different sort of issues and challenges. It seemed that the most useful way to test these microphones was to record a variety of subjects in varying "real" audio environments using both male and female voices. One of my main concerns was that I wanted to make sure that the mics were recorded both above wardrobe and below wardrobe. Based upon feedback from users, I also felt that a cable/handling test could be worthwhile as well as editing together samples from each lavalier cut together with samples from a shotgun/Hypercardioid.

Support Gear Used
I decided to record the samples with practical, common support gear. Most video and an increasing number of filmmakers do not record dual system sound or use a Zaxcom Deva, etc. Most video and an increasing number of HD films are shot with the microphones recorded directly with the camcorder.

Depending on the model of camcorder, most HD/HDV camcorders are capable of recording decent quality sound. I decided that I would run the signal through an audio mixer, then I would run line level output from the audio mixer to the line level inputs of the camcorder, bypassing the camcorders mic-preamps.

Recording Device
NTSC Panasonic HVX-200 P2 camcorder. Camera was set to record 48kHz/16 bit audio in the 720 24PN frame rate to P2 cards. All footage was loaded into Final Cut Pro 5.1.4 and .AIFF files were extracted. The .AIFF files were then compressed to reasonable size for publication on the web. This type of prosumer camcorder is a very common for many shooters today, although many also shoot HDV tape. Each microphone was fed into audio input one and two, with a roughly 15dB offset. Only one channel was used for the audio samples for this article, the single channel was center panned to for those listening to this with a stereo speaker set on the computer. Left and right channel are identical.

Cables
One twenty-foot XLR cable, Mogami cable and Canare XLR connecters

Audio Mixer
Professional Sound Corporation M4 MKII Audio Mixer. The PSC audio mixer supplied 48v phantom power to all of the microphones in the test. The M4 sent a line level output signal to the HVX-200.

Your Gear
To be honest, if you listen to the sound samples I have provided on average computer speakers or especially laptop speakers, you are not going to hear very many differences in the samples. Many of the differences between all of these microphones are in the very low frequency range and many of the differences between the different microphones are in the very high frequencies. Simply put, low quality gear is not capable if reproducing very low or very high frequencies with much accuracy. I analyzed all of these test clips on a playback system in a sound treated room through Genelec 1029a studio monitors with a Genelec 1091b subwoofer. The system and room has had spectrum analysis and the room has been EQ'd and tuned.

I suggest that if you want a fair evaluation of the clips, you need to obtain playback these samples on a decent quality, somewhat accurate playback system. If you do not have access to a decent quality playback system, listen to the samples on decent headphones. The signal will not be accurate but you will at least be able to hear the differences between the mics, the low frequency differences and the room tone and air tone, ambient sound differences. I tested these samples on my laptop speakers and on some cheap computer speakers and trust me, all of the mics sound the almost the same on lousy speakers.

[Top]


 
Test #1. Male Voice, Interior, Mic Above Wardrobe, Interview Setup

This test was designed to reproduce a typical interview setup. The room was a small office measuring 22' long by 14' wide with an 8' ceiling height. The room contained a nominal amount of furniture, a carpeted floor and one window. I have shot hundreds of interviews at corporations, movie studios and offices suites in rooms very much like this one.

The microphone was placed approximately six inches below the subject's mouth on the chest. I did not want to color the sound by using a windscreen or pop filter so for this test, all of the microphones were recorded bare with only the mic element placed on the chest of the subject. For this test, listen for the differences in the quality and timbre of the voice, noise levels and room reflections.

File Naming Convention For This Test
You will notice that each sound file below includes the suffix "Male" in the file name. I have tried to name each file with a unique set of initials so that if you download several, with a glance, you can tell which tests for which microphone you are listening to.

Sound Samples
Audio-TechnicaAT899Male
CountrymanB6Male
DPA 4061Male
DPA 4071Male
DPA 4080Male
PSC MillimicMale
SankenCOS-11xMale
SankenCOS-22Male
SennheiserMKE2GoldMale
SonotrimMale
Sony ECM-44BMale
Sony ECM-55BMale
Sony ECM-88BMale
Tram TR50BMale
Voice TechnologiesVT400Male
Voice TechnologiesVT500Male

 
Impressions after listening to the recorded samples for Test #1 Male Voice, Interior interview Setup

Audio-Technica AT899

If you listen to the sample of this microphone, it has a very pleasant, smooth and even sound. I noticed that this microphone has less proximity effect on the bass in the voice but still managed to sound smooth and mellow. This mic was also the only lavalier tested that had a hard wired bass rolloff function on the power supply tube, a unique feature that could be of use to you when shooting in noisy environments.

Countryman B6

I have owned and used a Countryman B6 for number of years now and I always enjoy shooting with it. The sound has a solid mid-range and bass emphasized sound that I find pleasant. The highs are smooth also. The main reason most people buy a B6 is because of it's amazingly tiny size but it also sounds very good, it's a two for one type of microphone, notable for both size and sound quality.

DPA 4061

Before I wrote this article, I had heard of the DPA microphones but had never used one myself. In listening to the playback of the 4061, I am struck by how uncolored and neutral the microphone sounds. The tonal quality is very accurate to how the voice sounded in real life. I don't hear any sibilance and I don't hear any boosted bass frequencies either. To my ear, a very impressive sounding microphone.

DPA 4071

The DPA 4071 has a similar, yet different sound quality than the DPA 4061. It shares the same neutral and uncolored characteristics, yet sounds a bit thinner than the 4061, it has a bit less mid-range and bass emphasis, while retaining that same very pleasant high end that the 4061 has. I would tend to use this mic over the 4061 if you had a very deep, rich voice to record that did not benefit from the additional bass emphasis of the 4061.

DPA 4080

The DPA 4080 is a unique microphone. It is rather large for a lavalier, but when you realize that it is a cardioid and must be used in plain sight, that you will not be able to hide it on the talent because it is a directional microphone with a distinct pattern, then its large size does not matter. The basic sound quality is close to the 4071 and 4061 but this mic seems to pick up more high end detail than either of the other two DPAs while retaining a rich and solid mid and bass response. The fact that you must keep reminding yourself about is that this microphone is mainly designed for newscasters and reporters or people giving speeches or recording audio in noisier situations. This is an unusual and unique microphone and if you are recording in an area or at event that will have a lot of background noise, this mic is an excellent choice, as long as you don't mind the mic being visible on-camera.

PSC Millimic

Professional Sound Corporation is a well established California-based brand that is mainly know for creating outstanding field mixers, microphone mounts and accessories. The Millimic is PSCs lavalier product. So how does it sound? I notice a lot of detail and upper mid range in the sound of it, it does not add or amplify bass or lower mid range. The Millimic presents with a very neutral, clean sound with a slight emphasis on upper mids.

Sanken COS-11X

The Sanken COS-11X is a very popular microphone. As a matter of fact, most professional sound mixers you speak with in the U.S. regularly use the COS-11 as their preferred lavalier microphone. One reason for the popularity of the COS-11X becomes apparent when you listen to this sound sample on quality speakers. Out of all of the lavs tested, the COS-11X seems to have the most open, natural and yes, shotgun/cardioid quality out of all of the lavs reviewed. The overall tonal reproduction is also very sweet sounding and smooth. The microphone is easy on the ears, especially for a lavalier.

Sanken COS-22

When I first received the COS-22 for testing, I had a tendency to judge it by its appearance. The COS-22 has an unusual shape for a lavalier microphone, it is "T" shaped but there is a good reason. The COS-22 is a two-channel microphone. It contains two microphone diaphragms in one housing and can be utilized in a number of ways. On newscasts and talk shows, you will often see anchors wearing two separate lavalier mics, each microphone side by side. If a broadcaster requires a stereo signal, the dual outputs of the COS-22 provide a stereo signal, albeit without much separation since the two mic elements are within about and inch and a half of each other. Conversely, some broadcasters require redundancy, a second microphone to serve as a backup to the main lavalier. The COS-22 provides a built in second channel redundancy in one microphone housing, a pretty nice feature when and if you ever need it.

Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold

With a medium sized capsule, the Sennheiser MKE-2 is an upper line offering from the German manufacturer. To my ears, the microphone presents with a lot of detail in the upper mids and high end. The MKE-2 sounds pleasant and smooth and seemed to have a fairly large rejection of ambient sound in the room. I found the microphone to be easy to work with and liked the final result when using it with a male voice.

Sonotrim STR-BPS

The Sonotrim is a very interesting microphone. It is the same microphone as the Tram TR50, but manufactured to a different specification as far as the electronics. In A/B comparing it between the Tram, the Sonotrim presents with less mid-range honkiness than the Tram. It's low end is smooth and evenly modulated like the Tram and it's high end detailed and clear. I have always liked the sound of the Tram, I own two of them myself but I found myself liking the sound of the Sonotrim even more. In comparison to the other lavs tested, The Sonotrim sounds very good with a male voice.

Sony ECM-44

I was very interested to hear the ECM-44 with the male voice. The ECM-44 is an older design and has a much larger physical size than most of the other lavaliers on the market. The microphone sounds very good. The ECM-44 is priced much lower than most other professional lavaliers on the market. The ECM-44 does not have the smoothness of some of the other lavaliers tested, but it does sound balanced and definitely usable in almost all situations. This test was a solid performance from a very economical model.

Sony ECM-55

One of the most interesting things about the ECM-55 was that in appearance, it is very similar to the ECM-44, but in sound quality, it is very different. The ECM-44 has a smooth, mellow sound with more emphasis in the bass and lower mids. The ECM-55 has a lot more clarity in the upper mids and in the highs than the ECM-44. The specs for both mics bear this out, the ECM-44 tops out at 15kHz, while the ECM-55 tops out at 18kHz. I suspect that the ECM-55 would prove superior to the ECM-44 for use under wardrobe, its accentuation of the higher frequencies would cut through cloth better.

Sony ECM-88

The ECM-88 represents Sony's top of the line lavalier microphone. I was very impressed with the small size of the ECM-88 and I was interested to hear how it would compare with the other lavs, both the Sonys and the other brands. The ECM-88 presents with a very neutral and polished sound that reminded me of the Sanken COS-11X but with less presence. The sound was neutral and made the male voice sound very much as it did in real life. An impressive performance.

Tram TR-50

I own two of the Tram TR50s and have used them for more than a decade so I am very familiar with the sound of the microphone. To me, the Tram has a slight boost in the upper mids and highs, so it is not a neutral sounding microphone like the ECM-88 and the Sanken COS-11X. It sounds different than most of the other microphones tested. The boost in the upper mids and highs is more apparent when the microphone is placed on the chest as it was for this test, but I like the frequency response in particular when the microphone is placed off axis, under shirt collars or under wardrobe. The mid/upper accentuation is a benefit in those types of situations. In interviews where I am trying to hide the mic, being able to place the lav under the shirt collar and still getting a clear sound with some presence is a great plus.

Voice Technologies VT-400

Before this article, I had never used a Voice Technologies lav so I was curious how the VT-400 would sound in different circumstances. When I listen back to the male voice, the first term that leaps to mind is smoothness and balance. The microphone seems to present with some of that elusive quality that makes the microphone easy to listen to at high volume for long periods of time without ear fatigue. I did not detect any emphasis in the lows, mids or highs. In A/B comparisons with all of the lavs, the VT-400 sounded most like the Sanken COS-11X, they both share a neutral and smooth quality.

Voice Technologies VT-500

The VT-500, even though the same company makes it, seems to have a very different sound than the VT-400. Cosmetically, the VT-500 looks very similar to the other rectangular mics like the Sonotrim, Tram and Millimic. Soundwise, it has a very smooth, clear quality but the mids are not as emphasized. Also, if you compare the construction of the VT-400 and VT-500, the VT-400 is cylindrical and the grid is out in the open. This means that the VT-400 may not be as easy to rig under wardrobe without hearing clothing rustle against the grid as the VT-500. The 500 is rectangular but the grid is a actually a circular opening that is inset into the rectangular body. This means that the VT-500 might be quicker to rig under wardrobe and might be less susceptible to clothes rustling against the grid. I very much liked the sound of the VT-500.


 
Test #2. Female Voice, Interior, interview setup, above wardrobe

This test was recorded in the same location as the first test, the difference being that I used a female talent.

The idea behind this test was to compare how each lavalier responds to a thinner, less projecting female voice. You will find that different lavs respond very differently to female voices than to male.

The microphone was placed on the subject's chest, about six inches below the mouth, above wardrobe.

File Naming Convention For This Test
You will notice that each sound file below includes the letters "FAW", which stands for "Female, Above Wardrobe". I have tried to name each file with a unique set of initials so that if you download several, with a glance, you can tell which tests for which microphone you are listening to.

Sound Samples
Audio-TechnicaAT899FAW CountrymanB6FAW
DPA 4061FAW
DPA 4071FAW
DPA 4080FAW
PSC MillimicFAW
Sanken COS-11xFAW
Sanken COS-22FAW
SennheiserMKE2GoldFAW
SonotrimFAW
Sony ECM-44BFAW
Sony ECM-55BFAW
Sony ECM-88BFAW
Tram TR50BFAW
Voice TechnologiesVT400FAW
Voice TechnologiesVT500FAW

 
Impressions after listening to the recorded samples for Test #2 Female Voice, Interior, interview setup, Above Wardrobe

Audio-Technica AT899

The AT-899 had a different sound quality on the female voice when compared to the male voice. I noticed less bass emphasis on the female voice and more detail on the female voice than on the male. The AT-899 seemed to also have more room tone with the female voice than it did on the male voice. The mic presented with a bit more sibilance on the female voice than on the male voice. A nice showing.

Countryman B6

The female talent with the Countryman B6 was a nice combination. With much less bass in her voice than the male talent, the B6 presented with a smooth, mellow tone. There was a hint of rolloff in the highs that I did not notice with the male voice but overall, the Countryman B6 sounded very nice with the female talent.

DPA 4061

The DPA sounded neutral with the female talent. No big boosts in the highs, mids or lows. The 4061 still manages to include great detail in the signal, even without artificially boosting any of the frequency ranges. The 4061 exhibits a good amount of presence and puts the soundstage front and forward.

DPA 4071

The DPA 4071 sounded a bit thinner than the 4061 did with the female voice, but not objectionably so. The 4071 seems to emphasize the highs more than the 4061 does. I do notice more room tone in the 4071 recording. Because of the slight boost in the upper mids and highs, I do notice a bit more sibilance on the 4071. Overall, I slightly liked the 4071 better on the male voice than the female voice but it still sounded just as good as any of the other lavs tested with the female voice.

DPA 4080

The DPA 4080 sounded basically in the same sound neighborhood as the other two DPA mics but if you A/B compare all three of them, the 4080 is notable for it's lack of room tone, ambient and ambient noise in comparison to the other two. Since the 4080 is a cardioid, it is quite directional. This mic would be very useful for on camera spokesperson duties and would be very good for location interviews if seeing the mic on the talent wasn't a problem or you could always frame it out in a CU. A nice sounding and unique mic, the DPA 4080 is an interesting choice for certain situations.

PSC Millimic

With the female talent, the PSC Millimic seemed to really emphasize the mids. The softer voice of the female talent recorded well although in post, I would round out the sound with EQ to add some lower end. The overall sound was very voice focused, as it should be, and the microphone did not present any undue sibilance or ambient noise. A nice choice.

Sanken COS-11X

The Sanken COS-11X sounded very nice with the female talent. Interestingly, it seemed to add some emphasis to the bass and low mids on the female talent, which the COS-11X didn't seem to do with the male talents voice. The smooth vocal quality that the COS-11X has seemed to really help out with the thinner voice of the female talent. The mic also featured good rejection of off axis sound.

Sanken COS-22

The COS-22 seemed to basically mimic the overall qualities of the COS-11X. I did notice a bit less high end frequency response in the COS-22 in comparison, but overall, the two microphones sounded similar. The large physical size of the COS-22 relegates it to exterior use where it is visible but if you are considering using a lavalier that you need either a stereo feed from or need redundant signal, the COS-22 offers a nice alternative to using two separate lavs.

Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold

The MKE2 is notable for it's great rejection of off-axis sound. Considering that most of the lavaliers tested are listed as omni-directional, the MKE2, in particular, had a very good rejection of noise. The sound was bright, yet full. I noticed that the MKE2 had a more laid back sound with the talent sounding not as close miked with this microphone as they did on many of the other mics. The MKE2 was impressive sounding to my ear.

Sonotrim STR-BPS

The Sonotrim sounds very laid back with the recording of the female talent sounding as if it was recorded further back than it was. The Sonotrim was positioned six inches from the mouth of the talent but when you play back the recording, it sounds as if the mic was positioned further from the talent than it was. The overall sound was very smooth, one of the best tested with this particular talent. I did not detect any particular frequency boost or deficiencies with the Sonotrim.

Sony ECM-44

The Sony ECM-44 sounded a bit thin to my ear with this particular talents voice. The overall sound quality was clear and pleasant but sounded a bit anemic with a softer voice. With the punch and projection of the male talent, the ECM-44 seemed to sound great. With the female talent, I felt as if the ECM-44 could use a bit more bass and mid range emphasis. The female talent sounded pretty far back in the soundstage.

Sony ECM-55

Conversely, I felt as the Sony ECM-55 worked much better with the female talent's voice qualities. It added much need presence and boost to her thinner voice and the ECM-55 brought the talent's voice to the forefront. I could see that this microphone would be a good choice for more soft spoken or whispery types of voices while possibly being too "in your face" for a voice that projects.

Sony ECM-88

The Sony ECM-88 proved itself to also be a contender for having smooth, even and well-modulated sound. I was very impressed with the overall sound quality of this microphone with the female talent. It sounded full, robust and was easy to listen to. The Sony sounded just as good with the female talent as it did with the male talent. The Sony held the distinction of having one of the highest list prices of all of the lavaliers tested and I can see why, it sounds like it should, awesome.

Tram TR-50

The Tram sounded good with the female talent. The crispness of the sound seemed to work well with this female talent. I did notice a small amount of enhanced sibilance with the female talent that I did not hear but overall, the sibilance was minor. I do think that the Tram excels in being placed in non-optimal locations like under collars and under wardrobe but even in the optimal placement we had for this test setup, it still had a clear and crisp response.

Voice Technologies VT-400

The VT-400 sounded decent with this talent but I did not find this to be an optimal mic choice with this talent in comparison to some of the other lavs. To my ear, the VT-400 sounded a little muffled and I did not hear the higher end clarity that I heard with some of the other mics. The sound was smooth and the dynamic range handling was good, but I couldn't help hearing what seemed to be a lack of high end. Unfortunately I did not record a sample of the female talent with the soft boost cap in place. If I would have, I feel that the sound would have probably contained the missing highs that I desired.

Voice Technologies VT-500

The VT-500 just flat out sounds different than the VT-400. Unlike with the male voice, I happened to really like the sound of this microphone better than the VT-400 on this particular talent. The overall sound quality was about the same but with the VT-500 placed in the exact same location as the VT-400, but on the VT-500, I heard much more clarity in the upper mid range and the highs. On the male voice, I like the VT-400 and 500 about equally but on this talent, the VT-500 was superior to my ear. This proves to be a confirmation that you do need to have different lavs for different talent; I don't believe that you can be truly happy with just one lavalier model for every shoot and every situation.


 
Test #3. Female Voice, Interior, interview setup, below wardrobe

This test was recorded in the same location as the first test, the difference being that I used a female talent. The idea behind this test was to compare how each lavalier responds to a thinner, less projecting female voice. You will find that different lavs respond very differently to female voices than to male.

The microphone was placed on the subject's chest, about six inches below the mouth, below a light wardrobe of a cotton shirt. Talent was wearing a medium weight cotton shirt below the first short to easily affix the lav to a surface. In most cases, a vampire clip was used to affix the lav under wardrobe, although in several cases, the lavalier was affixed between two triangles of gaffer tape. In all cases, the microphone was rigged with a strain relief and the cable was carefully taped down.

The microphone manufacturers sometimes include caps that alter the frequency response for when lavaliers are used underneath wardrobe. Wherever the manufacturer provided separate caps or grids that alter or boost frequency response, I tried to record separate sound files for each cap so that you could better hear the differences in the same recording situation with the same talent. In this way, you can at least get a decent idea of which cap would work best for your particular situation.

File Naming Convention For This Test
You will notice that each sound file below includes the letters "FUW", which stands for "Female, Under Wardrobe". I have tried to name each file with a unique set of initials so that if you download several, with a glance, you can tell which tests for which microphone you are listening to.

Sound Samples
Audio-TechnicaAT899FUW
CountrymanB6FUWVeryCrisp
CountrymanB6FUWCrisp
CountrymanB6FUWFlat
DPA 4061FUWHiFreqBoost
DPA 4061FUWSoftBoost
DPA 4071FUW
PSC MillimicFUW
Sanken COS-11xFUW
SennheiserMKE2GoldFUW
SonotrimFUW
Sony ECM-44BFUW
Sony ECM-55BFUW
Sony ECM-88BFUW
Tram TR50BFUW
Voice TechnologiesVT400FUWFlat
Voice TechnologiesVT400FUW2dBBoost
Voice TechnologiesVT400FUW6dBBoost
Voice TechnologiesVT500FUW

 
Impressions after listening to the recorded samples for Test #3 Female Voice, Interior, Interview Setup, Below Wardrobe

Audio-Technica AT899

The AT-899 had sounded good beneath wardrobe. The extra sibilance that was apparent when used above wardrobe was not as apparent in the below wardrobe recording. The wardrobe seemed to take a bit of the mids away from the talents voice but not too much to be objectionable. The AT-899 remains a viable contender for use under wardrobe.

Countryman B6

The Countryman B6 comes with three frequency response caps that are calibrated as: Flat = no boost or cut, Crisp = +4dB boost at 15kHz, Very Crisp = +8dB at 15kHz. I recorded the female talent with each of these caps in place and I think that the differences between the responses are very apparent when you listen to the samples. I thought that in the case of our reasonably light cotton shirt, the mic sounded most natural with the Crisp Response cap in place. I do think it is a nice idea to have the very Crisp Response cap for usage under heavier or more thick wardrobe. A very good performance from the Countryman B6

DPA 4061

I recorded the DPA 4061 with both of the grids supplied. The Soft Boost Grid gives a 3dB boost in the 8-20kHz range, while the High Frequency Boost grid gives a more significant 10dB boost at 12kHz. In this test, the Soft Boost sounded most natural to my ear but you can listen to both and judge for yourself. Overall, the qualities that serve the 4061 well when used above wardrobe continue to help its overall sound when used beneath wardrobe. I felt that the overall sound below wardrobe was excellent.

DPA 4071

I was interested to hear if the higher frequency bias that I heard in this microphone on the female talent when used above wardrobe would still be apparent when the mic was buried underneath a shirt. It was, but in a very positive way. In analyzing the design of the 4071, it seems that it was expressly designed for use underneath wardrobe. Personally I like the sound of the 4071 better than the 4061 when used underneath wardrobe, while I like the sound of the 4061 better when used above wardrobe. Different mics for different uses. The 4071 is a great choice for narrative work.

DPA 4080

Because of it's size and the fact that it is a Cardioid mic, I did not test the 4080 underneath wardrobe. Cardioid mics are directional so by burying it underneath wardrobe, it would not have sounded right.

PSC Millimic

The Millimic sounded decent underneath wardrobe. PSC has thoughtfully included a neat wardrobe guard mount that isolates the Millimic from clothing rubbing on it very effectively. The PSC retained most of the same sound characteristics underneath wardrobe that it exhibited in the above wardrobe recordings. The sound was balanced with a slight tendency toward thinness when used under wardrobe. This apparent thinness when used underneath wardrobe with this particular talent could easily be rounded out with just a touch of EQ in post. A solid performance.

Sanken COS-11X

The COS-11X sounded good with this talent. The smoothness and fine detail that this microphone brought to this situation was not apparent in all of the other lavs. It seems that when recording through wardrobe, some of the other mics seemed to record rather coarsely, their same basic sound characteristics were apparent but the overall sound seemed grainier and rougher than when they were used above wardrobe. Not so with the COS-11X, it sounded just as smooth and complete underneath wardrobe as it did above wardrobe.

Sanken COS-22

Because of it's large and unusual shape, I did not record with the COS-22 underneath wardrobe. The COS-22 excels in above wardrobe usage but is not the best choice for using beneath wardrobe.

Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold

The Sennheiser sounded very good underneath wardrobe. This was a microphone that sounded very similar above and below wardrobe, a rarity as the other tests will make apparent. The sound quality underneath the short was detailed and smooth and the overall crispness and clarity were not diminished when used under clothing. The term that comes to mind as I listen to this test sample is consistent. A nice candidate for this talents voice.

Sonotrim STR-BPS

The Sonotrim had a lot of the same characteristics as the Sennheiser when used underneath wardrobe. It was smooth, full and detailed, just as the Sennheiser and Sanken were. I sensed a bit more robustness to the bass and lower mids, which in the case of a thinner voice like our test subject had was a good thing. If you were recording a deeper voice that projected, this might be too much but for female talent with a voice like the talent I tested with, the Sonotrim was a good choice.

Sony ECM-44

The Sony ECM-44 is a solid performer but to my ear, in the under wardrobe test with this female talents voice, it ended up sounding a bit too muffled. The basic sound quality sounded fine to me but the highs that I wanted to hear just were not there. The ECM-44 does not come with any sort of vampire clip or under wardrobe rigging so I used the trusted "two triangles of gaffer tape" method. While the microphone did not have any issues with rubbing, rustling or clothing noise, the sound did strike me as a bit muted for this usage.

Sony ECM-55

The Sony ECM-55 had a pretty nice sound when used underneath wardrobe. The extra emphasis that the mic imparts on the upper mid range and the highs makes it balance out very nicely when used under light wardrobe like I used in this test. The sound was crisp, clear and nicely modulated. I rigged the ECM-55 with the same triangles of gaffer tape as I used for the ECM-44. Very impressive.

Sony ECM-88

The detail and smooth, even sound quality that the ECM-88 presented with when used underneath wardrobe was astounding. This microphone sounds very nice when used under clothing. The sound struck me as having a much more detailed and pleasant to listen to sound than some of the other lavs. Sony obviously did their homework when they engineered the ECM-88, it's sound was outstanding when used underneath wardrobe.

Tram TR-50

The Tram sounded good under wardrobe. Some of the emphasis on the highs that was apparent in the above wardrobe testing actually are smoothed out and toned down when used underneath wardrobe. I felt as if the Tram offered superb clarity and a smoother tone when used underneath the light wardrobe than when used above the wardrobe. Tram provides a full kit of mounting accessories with the TR50, many of them are very useful when mounting the mic underneath wardrobe. The Tram turned in a great performance in this test. In the above wardrobe tests, I preferred the overall sound of the Sonotrim over the Tram but in this test, I felt the Tram sounded superior.

Voice Technologies VT-400

I tested the VT-400 in three different configurations for this test so that you could compare the differences in sound quality. The first test, flat, with no grid, sounded the most natural to me, if possibly a little deficient in upper mids and highs. The second recording with the grid cap placed all of the way down sounded better on the highs but the mids seemed a bit nasal to my ear. The third recording with the 6dB boost seemed to be too much, I heard too many highs, although with heavier wardrobe, it might have sounded perfect. Overall, I thought that the VT-400 did a very good job underneath wardrobe.

Voice Technologies VT-500

The VT-500 sounded good underneath wardrobe, but different than the VT-400 did with any of it's three frequency options did. I sensed a different EQ on the mids. I though that the VT-400 flat had a more natural sound to it, rather than the accentuated mids and highs that the VT-500 presented with but that is just my personal preference. If I had not A/B compare the VT-400 with the VT-500, I would probably be very satisfied with the sound of the VT-500, it did sound very good, just not as natural as the VT-400 with this particular talents voice. The VT-500 is a very nice sounding microphone for use under wardrobe.


 
Test #4. Cable Handling Noise Test

I wanted to give you an indication of how each microphone handled physical noise. There is a type of noise that is sometimes present in the body of some lavaliers, the cable or even in the microphones power supply XLR tube called microphonics. This is where physical manipulation of the device can cause electronic noise. The microphone can actually amplify the noise a cable being rubbed or moved. While the test I performed is probably not the most scientifically accurate way that microphone and cable noise handling could be made, it worked out decently.

I rigged each lavalier to my chest and then manipulated the microphone cable while turning and twisting my torso to simulate an actor or interview subject moving around during performance. Take the results of this portion of the testing with a grain of salt but it is interesting to hear which microphones seemed more susceptible to handling noise.

File Naming Convention For This Test
You will notice that each sound file below includes the letters "CN" in the file name. CN stands for Cable Noise. I have tried to name each file with a unique set of initials so that if you download several, with a glance, you can tell which tests for which microphone you are listening to.

 
Sound Samples
Audio-TechnicaAT899CN
CountrymanB6CN
DPA 4061CN
DPA 4071CN
DPA 4080CN
PSC MillimicCN
SankenCOS-11xCN
SankenCOS-22CN
SennheiserMKE2GoldCN
SonotrimCN
Sony ECM-44BCN
Sony ECM-55BCN
Sony ECM-88BCN
Tram TR50BCN
Voice TechnologiesVT400CN
Voice TechnologiesVT500CN

 
Impressions after listening to the recorded samples for Test #4 Cable Noise Handling Test

Audio-Technica AT899

The AT-899 turns in a very good result in this test. I began with about 12" of slack in the microphone cable. I then coiled the cable up while turning and twisting my torso. I heard very little handling or cable noise.

Countryman B6

The B6 exhibits a bit more handling and cable noise than some of the other mics but overall its performance in this test was good. It should be noted that the cable on the B6 is much smaller and thinner than any of the cables on any of the other lavs tested.

DPA 4061

The DPA 4061 exhibited basically no audible cable noise handling noise; it was very isolated from noise.

DPA 4071

The DPA 4071 exhibited basically no audible cable noise handling noise; it was very isolated from noise.

DPA 4080

The DPA 4080 exhibited basically no audible cable noise handling noise; it was very isolated from noise.

PSC Millimic

The PSC Millimic exhibited low levels of noise when handling the cable.

Sanken COS-11X

The Sanken COS-11X exhibited low levels of cable handling noise.

Sanken COS-22

The Sanken COS-22 exhibited very low levels of cable handling noise.

Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold

The Sennheiser MKE-2 exhibited a bit more cable handling noise than some of the other microphones.

Sonotrim STR-BPS

The Sonotrim STR-BPS exhibited very low levels of cable handling noise.

Sony ECM-44

The Sony ECM-44 exhibited a bit more cable handling noise than some of the other mics tested

Sony ECM-55

The Sony ECM-55 exhibited a bit more cable handling noise than some of the other mics tested

Sony ECM-88

The ECM-88 exhibited basically no audible cable noise handling noise; it was very isolated from noise.

Tram TR-50

The Tram TR50 exhibited very low levels of cable handling noise.

Voice Technologies VT-400

The Voice Technologies VT-400 exhibited low levels of cable handling noise. For some reason, probably fatigue from recording over 100 audio test clips, in some of the audio test clips, I inadvertently referred to "Voice Technologies" as "Audio Technologies". My apologies for any confusion, I definitely meant to say, "Voice Technologies".

Voice Technologies VT-500

"The Voice Technologies VT-500 exhibited basically no audible cable noise handling noise; it was very isolated from noise. For some reason, probably fatigue from recording over 100 audio test clips, in some of the audio test clips, I inadvertently referred to "Voice Technologies" as "Audio Technologies. My apologies for any confusion, I definitely meant to say, "Voice Technologies".


 
Test #5. Cutting Between Shotgun/Cardioid and Lavalier

The aim of this test was to determine how each lavalier would cut between itself and a shotgun microphone or a cardioid variant microphone. Fortunately I recorded the audio samples for all of the lavaliers in this test in the same room with the same gear as I recorded all of the microphones for my recent article on shotguns and cardioid variants
As I Hear It - Choosing the Right Microphone

I always recommend shooting with a lavalier and a shotgun or cardioid microphone whenever possible for the simple reason that it gives you or your editor choices. If you experience too many ambient issues like traffic, background noise or HVAC with the shotgun/cardioid, you can use the lavalier. If you experience noise issues like whiskers rubbing on a starched shirt collar or clothes rustling against the lavalier, you can use the shotgun/cardioid. What If you did have to cut between your shotgun/cardioid and your lavalier, how would it sound?

Typically a shotgun/cardioid will have a lot more ambient sound and more low frequency content than a lavalier. I could not compare every lavalier with every shotgun and every cardioid variant microphone that I had so I decided to use the Sanken CS-3e as a control shotgun and the Schoeps CMC-641 as a control cardioid variant. Both of these microphones are very popular and exhibited very neutral sound characteristics in the tests that I recorded for the shotgun article.

In each clip, you will hear me state the name of Sanken CS-3e, then the name of the lavalier model, then the name of the Schoeps CMC-641, followed by the repeated clip of the lavalier. This will allow you to hear how each lavalier would cut between the other two microphone types. Listen for the amounts of low frequency content, the amounts of ambient and how the tonal quality would cut between the different models. Typically if you had to cut between a lavalier and a shotgun or cardioid, you would add more bass to the lavalier sound to even out the transition although I noticed that the shotgun and cardioid controls actually had more high end frequency content in most cases as well.

So here we go, same room, mixer, voice talent and ambient noise levels, listen for which models you feel would work best for your needs.

 
File Naming Convention For This Test
You will notice that each sound file below includes the letters "SL" in the file name. SL stands for Shotgun/Lav. I have tried to name each file with a unique set of initials so that if you download several, with a glance, you can tell which tests for which microphone you are listening to.

 
Sound Samples
Audio-TechnicaAT899SL
CountrymanB6SL
DPA 4061SL
DPA 4071SL
DPA 4080SL
PSC MillimicSL
SankenCOS-11xSL
SankenCOS-22SL
SennheiserMKE2GoldSL
SonotrimSL
Sony ECM-44BSL
Sony ECM-55BSL
Sony ECM-88BSL
Tram TR50BSL
Voice TechnologiesVT400SL
Voice TechnologiesVT500SL

 
Impressions after listening to the recorded samples for Test #5 Cut Between Shotgun/Cardioid and Lavalier.

Audio-Technica AT899

The AT-899 turns in a very good result in this test.I like how the bass in the AT-899 was pretty close to the amount of bass in the Sanken and Schoeps. There were some notable differences in the mids and definitely in the highs but I feel with the right EQ, the AT-899 could cut between a shotgun or cardioid very well. Amazing performance for such a low cost microphone.

Countryman B6

I only tested the B6 with the flat frequency response cap. I felt that it was definitely in the same ballpark as the shotgun and cardioid control clips. The mids on the Countryman were more dominant than the shotgun or cardioid but I feel that with some careful EQ, the Countryman could successfully cut in with the shotgun or cardioid.

DPA 4061

The DPA 4061 exhibited basically very similar qualities to the shotgun and the cardioid mics. The sound of the 4061 was cleaner and more open than most of the other mics in this test. Unlike several of the others, the DPA 4061 would require little to no EQ to successfully cut between the shotgun or cardioid. Top notch performance!

DPA 4071

The DPA 4071 had excellent mids and lows in matching the shotgun and cardioid. The highs seemed a tiny bit muffled in comparison but I feel that the overall sound was 90% the same as the other two mics, which is saying a lot. Some slight tweaks in EQ and you would have a basically seamless match. Nice going.

DPA 4080

Since the DPA 4080 is already a miniature cardioid, I was very curious as to how it would perform in comparison to the shotgun and cardioid. The 4080 had slightly more mid range than the Sanken CS-3e shotgun but was a decent match for the Schoeps CMC-641. Some slight EQing would be needed to get a seamless match but overall, the 4080 came very close.

PSC Millimic

The PSC Millimic did not seem to have much audio resemblance to the shotgun or cardioid. The MilliMic, when compared to the shotgun and cardioid, exhibited markedly less bass response and seemed to have a predominance of mid range. It would take some pretty drastic EQing to move the MilliMic to the same aural neighborhood. This is not a bad characteristic, it just means that the MilliMic may not be your best choice if you think that you will be cutting back and forth between a shotgun or a cardioid and the MilliMic.

Sanken COS-11X

Since the control shotgun is the Sanken CS-3e, I was especially curious to hear how the two would cut together. In a word, they are close, but not an exact match. The bass and low mids have similar characteristics but the mids and highs seem a bit different. To my ear, the COS-11X is an 8 to the DPA 4061's 9+ in matching the shotgun. In matching the cardioid, the COS-11X seemed a touch better. Great sound but would require a touch of EQ to seamlessly cut.

Sanken COS-22

The Sanken COS-22 interestingly seemed to be more accurate to the CS-3e than the COS-11X was. The match was uncanny and it cut very well against the CMC-641 as well. The COS-22 represents an interesting microphone choice. It matched the shotgun and cardioid very well.

Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold

The Sennheiser MKE-2 exhibited very close performance in the lows and highs to our two control shotgun and cardioid mics. The main disparity seemed to be in the mids and with a slight addition of some mid range emphasis, the MKE-2 would be a very close match. A very good performance.

Sonotrim STR-BPS

The Sonotrim STR-BPS exhibited slightly less bass and different mids than the two control mics but overall was a pretty decent match up. As with most of the other lavaliers, by adding some minor EQ, you could obtain a pretty good match in seamlessly cutting between the lav and the shotgun/cardioid.

Sony ECM-44

The Sony ECM-44 seemed to have a thinner, kind of more muffled tone than the shotgun or cardioid but overall, if you weren't listening carefully, the Sony would cut against the two control mics quite well. The overall sound is very good and the low cost makes the Sony an exceptional value.

Sony ECM-55

The Sony ECM-55 exhibited a bit less presence that either of the control mics but overall was a good match. The mids seem to be a bit scooped in comparison to the shotgun/cardioid but with some careful matching of the mids and a bit more bass, you could successfully intercut the ECM-55 with a shotgun or cardioid.

Sony ECM-88

The ECM-88 exhibited very smooth sound on it's own but when A/B compared with the shotgun, the mids seemed to be more dominant. The highs would need some more level and the ECM-88 didn't sound as smooth. A good performance but I would expect better for the price range. Its strange, on it's own, the ECM-88 sounds superb but when A/B compared with the two control mics, the ECM-88 suddenly doesn't sound as comparable to my ear. Not a bad performance but I expected better in this test.

Tram TR-50

The Tram TR50 exhibited a very good match with the Sanken CS-3e in particular, The mids on the Tram could be toned down a touch to match better but overall, a very impressive performance in this test. The Tram has always been regarded as cutting well with shotguns and cardioids and this test bears that out. I think I like it even a touch better than the Sonotrim in this particular test although on its own, I like the sound of the Sonotrim better.

Voice Technologies VT-400

The Voice Technologies VT-400 just needed a little bit of high frequency boost to match the Sanken CS-3e. The match between the VT-400 and the Schoeps was even better to my ear. A very good performance from a relative newcomer from Europe.

Voice Technologies VT-500

The Voice Technologies VT-500, to my ear, did not match as well as the VT-400 seemed to. The VT-500, while still retaining a good basic sound quality, had less bass and a very different mid range structure than the Sanken CS-3e or the Schoeps CMC-641. I feel that the enhanced high end that Voice Technologies puts into this mic for use under wardrobe probably hobbles it a bit for this particular test. Not a bad match but not as good as its sibling.

 
Final Evaluation and Recommendations
Lavalier microphones are at once both common and unusual. They seem to be the piece of gear that everyone uses but few seem to discuss the finer points of. In evaluating these sixteen models, I discovered that each of them have their own unique qualities, advantages and disadvantages. All of them actually sounded pretty decent with a few sounding outstanding.

  • For some, small size would be a primary concern since often the major secondary goal in using a lavalier is to make sure that it stays hidden.
  • For some, the pure quality of the sound is of primary importance.
  • For live performance and in narrative use, the ability to repel sweat, makeup and other foreign matter may be important.
  • Cost is also a primary factor for many users these days. Budgets, if anything, are shrinking and getting tighter and tighter so finding a high quality, good sounding lavalier for a reasonable price will be a factor for many as well.

 
For Your Part
I am listening to all of the audio samples I recorded as I imagine which situations each of these microphones could best be used in. I encourage you to do the same. Keep in mind that the method for comparison between audio components, whether microphones, mixers or audio monitors usually comes from A/B comparisons between your two or three most likely candidates. I have learned that our ears and brain have an incredibly short memory. Our ears and brain, because they are so adaptive to surroundings, also become easily confused. The most common mistake potential audio buyers make is to listen to dozens of potential candidates in a row. This will do nothing but confuse your ear and brain. If you are serious about evaluating these microphones for purchase, I would encourage you NOT to sit down and listen to all of the sound samples for all of the microphones in this article in one sitting. You will do nothing except fatigue your ear and confuse your mind about which microphones sound like what. If you are just curious and doing preliminary research, listen away, it doesn't matter, but if you are trying to narrow down which microphone to buy immediately, read on.

The best way to evaluate sound components begins on paper or on your computer screen. Do your research. Read manufacturer and sound magazine websites. Talk to people in sound forums. It is pointless to evaluate $600.00 microphones if you only have $300.00 to spend on one. In the end, you should base your buying decision off of a body of research, not from any one recommendation, not even this article. Most recommendations you will get about which microphones to buy are not objective. Take it all in, process and distill your opinion down with what matters most to you. Quality? Quality regardless of cost? Cost? Off-axis rejection? I would advise you to begin narrowing your selection by evaluating microphone candidates that are in your general price range by doing the research.

There are several microphones tested in this article that are considered "industry standards". This, to me has always meant very little to my evaluative process. As in many other areas in life, buying into what the status quo uses is sometimes a good thing but often, you can discover a microphone that costs less and provides superior results for your particular needs. The bottom line is to have an open mind and ear and truly evaluate what will sound best and work best for your situation.

Do You Have Feelings of Guilt?
Once you have lined up potential candidates, the best of all worlds is to get your hands on a sample and use it. Nothing beats an ears-on demonstration. If you visit a quality location sound dealer, almost all will let you evaluate potential microphones that you may purchase from them. Location sound is one of the few industries where there are still many small, quality companies nationwide that offer great advice and service. In my opinion, it is bad form to go to an audio dealer, pick their brain, put your hands all over numerous microphones, then walk out and purchase your selection from that huge dealer in NYC over the Internet because they have the same microphone $50.00 cheaper. People who do this (you know who you are) think that you are smart because you can get the microphone cheaper on-line but in reality, they are making a seriously short sighted decision when they do this. The decision they make could eventually put all of our best small audio shops out of business. I am all for capitalism and getting the best deal, just realize that the best deal is not always the lowest priced deal. Taking care of you after the sale, offering ongoing advice and bailing you out on a Friday late afternoon for a weekend shoot are all things that my favorite two or three audio retailers have done for me over the years. A good location sound dealer is easily worth paying a few bucks more in my opinion.

 
My Final Overall Evaluations

Audio-Technica AT899

The AT-899 was frankly a surprise to me. I have not used it before and I have not spoken with many forum members on-line who use it so I did not have high expectations for it. I was very impressed with the features, this was the only lavalier that had a built-in bass roll off on the power supply. The sound was smooth and mellow but not dull. This microphone also cut very well with the shotgun/cardioid. It sounded very good under wardrobe and with the female talent's voice. It's $299.00 list price places it right on the lower side of the medium priced lavaliers. I feel that the AT-899 is an excellent value and that it sounds as good as many of the more expensive lavaliers. This microphone is a natural for those purchasing the new Audio-Technica 1800 Series wireless mic system.

Countryman B6

The Countryman B6 is an unusual microphone in that it is miniscule in size, yet it still manages to turn a good performance in almost every category. I really like the small size and the accessories are very good. The response caps offer additional extra value in that you can actually tailor the sound at the source, rather than relying on EQ to make the mic sound like you want it to. The Countryman had more cable and handling noise than some of the other lavs but not to an objectionable level. This microphone is one of the few lavaliers that are small enough to be used behind a button, making it one of the easiest to rig, hide and work with out of all of the lavs available. The fact that Countryman also makes the mic sweat proof, water resistant and makeup resistant just adds to its appeal. A great performer overall. Not as smooth sounding as some of the larger mics but it still sounds very good.

DPA 4061

The DPA 4061 was a dark horse. I always knew that the DPA mics existed; I just didn't know anyone who had ever used one. To my ear, the DPA 4061 offered the smoothest, most balanced and detailed sound of all of the microphones tested. While not an inexpensive microphone, I feel that the 4061 offers outstanding value since it sounds actually slightly better to me that some of the more expensive microphones. The 4061's ability to seamlessly cut between the Sanken CS-3e and the Schoeps CMC 641 with very little EQ is a nice feature. The overall tone of this mic was natural and easy to listen to for long periods of time. I highly recommend this microphone.

DPA 4071

The DPA 4071 was also a very good sounding microphone. For various, subtle reasons, I preferred the sound of the 4061 to the 4071 but the 4071 still sounded excellent. I have a feeling that with more exposure and more awareness, I could see DPA giving some of the industry's established brands a good run for there money, these microphones are that good. The accessories available for this microphone also add additional value as does the availability of additional colors. A very strong performance.

DPA 4080

The DPA 4080 is different animal than all of the other models tested. Its cardioid properties really do allow the 4080 to reject a tremendous amount of off-axis noise while still retaining a clean, clear and smooth sound quality to the voice. The 4080 is physically imposing and will not be able to be hidden but if your lavalier needs favor rejection of off-axis noise more than the ability to hide the mic, the 4080 could be for you. Perfect for newscasts, reporters in the field, live PA work, etc. I am glad that I had a chance to evaluate it, it is a great tool.

PSC MilliMic

The PSC Millimic represents a good solid mid-level value in the lavalier world. The MilliMic comes with some unusual mounts and accessories and the sound seems to favor a mid-range boost. This microphone is recommended for whisperers, low talkers and other subjects that could benefit from some nice mid-range boost in their voice. The detachable TA-5F connector that our review sample came with fits on the wireless Lectrosonic and Audio Techinca U100 series straight out of the box. The PSC powertube worked flawlessly in powering the MilliMic and offered a solid connection between the capsule and the power supply. The MillMic represents a solid value and good sound quality.

Sanken COS-11X

Trew Audio had an on-line poll on their website recently. In the poll, it asked sound mixers what their number one choice in a lavalier microphone was. 48% of the response was for the Sanken COS-11. The next nearest competitor was a mere 14%. What this means to me is that people really like this microphone. I agree, it has excellent sound quality, it has excellent build quality. The COS-11X was developed in Japan for NHK, the Japanese broadcaster and it shows the typical Japanese attention to detail. I was surprised that some of the other mics cut with the Sanken CS-3e better but the COS-11X was definitely in the neighborhood of being one of the best. Care should be taken when rigging the COS-11X as it did display a small amount of cable noise. The sound quality is open, detailed and clear. It's available in multiple colors with several different mounting options. The COS-11X is a superb piece of gear and I highly recommend it.

Sanken COS-22

The Sanken COS-22 was an enigma. This microphone will end up in limited usage for the typical production scenario, it is more suited to specialized situations like when dual redundancy is needed or when stereo is needed, but it's sound quality is outstanding. The COS-22 did well in every test and was a genuinely great sounding mic. It's physical dimensions restrict it to newscasts, public address and other sorts of production where the microphone can be seen in plain view. I was not successful in rigging the COS-22 under wardrobe but it could be used in several different sorts of situations. The COS-22 is a solid performer and a good value if you need its special features.

Sennheiser MKE-2 Gold

The Sennheiser MKE-2 exhibited excellent rejection of off axis noise. The MKE-2 also sounded good with both male and female voices. The only shortcoming I was able to find was a little bit more cable handling noise was present in this microphone. This just means that you must be more careful when rigging the microphone on talent that you have proper isolation and strain relief on the cable. The Sennhesier turned in a solid performance when cutting between the Sanken CS-3e shotgun and the Schoeps CMC-641 supercardioid. Overall, the Sennhesier MKE-2 Gold is a winner.

Sonotrim STR-BPS

The Sonotrim STR-BPS presented an interesting scenario. I very much liked its overall sound quality, it is a smooth and solid sounding mic. It sounded better than the Tram TR-50B in most of the tests save for the cutting between the shotgun and cardioid test. In that particular test, I preferred the sound of the Tram slightly. The accessories pack is excellent, the sound and build quality are great, what's not to like? I heartily recommend the Sonotrim, it is an outstanding performer.

Sony ECM-44

The Sony ECM-44 clocked in all of the tests with at least solid and in some cases outstanding performance. Frankly, I used the ECM-44 in film school and was never impressed with it. That was many years ago. In evaluating it now with a more trained and perhaps more mature ear, the ECM-44 very much impressed me as an outstanding value. This microphone costs significantly less than any other microphone tested, with the exception of the PSC, yet it sounded at least in the middle of the pack, edging to the upper end of the pack on some of the tests. The ECM-44 is physically large but if you can work with the less than state of the art size, the microphone is a solid value.

Sony ECM-55

The Sony ECM-55 is a nice step up from the ECM-44. Yes, it costs more but for your extra expenditure, you gain additional mounting options, slightly clearer and more concise sound quality and a larger model number ;-) I felt that the ECM-55 was a solid performer in almost every test, it performed well with all sorts of voices. The extra mounting clips give you some interesting mounting options. The ECM-55 did particularly well in the under the wardrobe test, it's extra presence and slightly boosted highs help to maintain clear sound through a layer of fabric. A nice microphone at a good price.

Sony ECM-88

The ECM-88 is a great sounding microphone. It is small, it has a unique and quite transparent sound. I was a bit disappointed in its performance in the cutting between the shotgun and cardioid test, I felt that for a $600.00 microphone, it should have blended better. Keep in mind however that all shotguns and cardioids sound different and I only tested cutting between the ECM-88 and one each model of shotgun and cardioid, it may cut better with other models of shotgun and cardioid. The microphone is a finely crafted precision piece. It's detachable Hirose connector allows for hard wired or wireless unit use with the right adapter. The ECM-88 is a great performer. Although it is not inexpensive, the ECM-88 offers solid value for the dollar.

Tram TR-50

The Tram TR50 is what is known as a "workhorse". I think that the Tram is thought of in this way because so many have been sold and used by so many video/film crews for so long, that its just known as a commodity. We should not forget what made the Tram such an industry standard though. It sounds really good, it's reliable, it comes with a great assortment of mounting options. The Tram also cuts really almost seamlessly with many shotguns and cardioids. The Tram is a great workhorse and will last you a long time. A superb value.

Voice Technologies VT-400

The Voice Technologies VT-400 was an interesting sounding microphone. I personally was really impressed by the performance and value of the VT-400. It performed quite well in all of the tests. The VT-400 deserves a larger audience. For a list price of under $350.00, the VT-400 is a solid value and will hopefully gain in popularity. The VT-400s ability to clearly pick up voice in challenging scenarios means that it could be good particularly for reality TV and run & gun shooting situations.

Voice Technologies VT-500

The Voice Technologies VT-500 is made by the same company as the VT-400 but it costs significantly less and has a slightly different sound personality that makes it ideally suited for narrative use under wardrobe. I was very impressed by the design of the recessed diaphragm and it's ability to record clear sound without wardrobe noise. It may sound trite, but it's the little things that count as well. The craftsmanship, the cool waterproof case and the design all add up to make the VT-500 a winner in the under $300.00 list category.

Wrap Up
There are an amazing assortment of lavalier microphones on the market today. The choices that we have are amazing in their depth and complexity. I hope that by taking you through this review, you have hopefully gained some insight into which lavaliers you need to add to your audio kit. I personally own four lavaliers and am looking forward to adding a few more to my kit. Lavaliers are really designed to best perform certain aspects of location sound, each one has it's special purpose and is ideally suited to specific production scenarios. I hope that this article has been helpful in guiding you to the right choices for your situation.

 
Acknowledgments and Thanks
I would like to thank the various manufacturers and distributors who graciously supplied the review samples and answered many technical questions:

Karen Emerson - Audio-Technica
Shane Beeson - DPA
Angelica Dewlow - Location Sound Corporation
Steve Joachim - Location Sound Corporation
Jim Pace - Plus24
Jerry Bruck - Posthorn Recordings
Ron Meyer - Professional Sound Corporation
Scott Boland - Redding Audio
Dawn Birr - Sennheiser USA
Scott Houston - Sennheiser USA
Joe Douillard - Shoreview Distribution
Art Gonzales - Sony Pro Audio
Kevin Dick - Sony Pro Audio

 
Dan Brockett, is an independent television producer based in Los Angeles, Ca. Dan's most recent projects include documentaries for the DVD releases of Paramount Pictures Braveheart: Special Edition and Warner Bros. Special Edition of Howard Hawks Rio Bravo. Dan is also known for shooting and producing two top rated episodes of A&E's Biography. Dan is currently in development on three television shows for 2008. Dan can be reached at dan@biglittlefilms.com.

[Top]

copyright © www.kenstone.net 2008

© 2000 -2008 Ken Stone. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Final Cut Pro, Macintosh and Power Mac
are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Apple. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

All screen captures, images, and textual references are the property and trademark of their creators/owners/publishers.