Re: FCPX 10.2.2
Re: FCPX 10.2.2
(September 05, 2015 07:26AM)
Joe Redifer
Personally I'm just sad that interlacing is still a thing.
I agree. But until all broadcast carriers can handle high bandwidth, which won't happen any day soon, interlaced is going to stay.
Best wishes,
Ronny
Re: FCPX 10.2.2
(September 05, 2015 11:01PM)
Gypaetus
Recently I suffered myself also from the interlacing problem:
shooting (low end) some little features and especially concerts I usually have to include all my existing camera equipment - i.e. two HDVs (interlaced), plus my current favorite DSLR and my GoPro (both 1080p).
My question to you experts:
what is the best work flow to edit such a multiple camera enterprise? (I still use FCP 5.1.4. )
I prefer to end up with 1080p (mostly H264) .
Is there a preferred way (plug-in etc.) to de-interlace - either while importing the tapes or afterwards?
How does an edit from mixed sources influence this matter?
Many thanks!
Re: FCPX 10.2.2
(September 06, 2015 07:31AM)
Joe Redifer
I think the next time we massively overhaul our broadcast codecs and render all current TV tuners obsolete we should do away with interlacing. We're still using MPEG 2 which is probably the worst thing to broadcast with. Over-the-air television looks worse than a mediocre Youtube video. Granted, that's due in large part to stations having lots of sub-channels. I just don't know how anyone can feel proud about delivering content that's crushed to badly.
Re: FCPX 10.2.2
(September 06, 2015 12:07PM)
Joe Redifer
Ha ha!
|